Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Longview Oil Corp LGVWF



GREY:LGVWF - Post by User

Comment by BlueCollar51on Feb 28, 2014 2:41pm
355 Views
Post# 22265728

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Hey bshort92

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Hey bshort92
Nawaralsaadi wrote:
I think it is important to differentiate between the actual and effective deal price when it comes to a deal with Surge, unlike any other buyer SGY has acquired 20% of LNV at an extremely low valuation. Thus, for example, if they were to pay $6.4 for the float, their effective price is only $6. This is why it is highly likely that a deal will take place at $6+ for the float.
 
Regards,
Nawar



Nawar; Let’s assume that at some point Surge offers us Longview shareholders an all share offer
.
For anyone with a mid to long term view wouldn’t the relative value (based on the fundamentals) of the LNV / SGL shares and the Fundamental Value of the Result be more important than whatever they may be trading at?

I think that it’s a given that the SPs of both companies will be bounced around by the Short Term and Day Traders but at the end of the day it’s the Fundamentals that count for Investors

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>