RE:RE:RE:ARTICLE about BIR versus POUI admire the fact that you are not concerned that someone is shorting a stock that you may own. Obviously there are many companies whose balance sheets, position in the market place and competent management easily outweigh the threat of any individual person's short position.
However I wonder about the ethics of a group of individuals or entities who may " tag team" a stock in terms of shorting and the efficacy of the naked short. It would seem that to be able to short a stock without so much as having to borrow the shares is like a branch of the legal system based upon on the idea of squatter's rights. It literally flies in the face of that old adage, "possession in nine tenths of the law."
This is off topic but that previous short overhang on BIR prior to the run-up really bugged me so that's why I bring it up. For all I know that short position might still be there.