RE:its pretty Simple Tom !!MaxT - you and I and TomG have all been supportive of EAG on this BB. We all have a vested interest in the success of EAG.
You are correct that moving from inferred to indicated is great news - however - TomG is also correct that the drill holes (particularly from the 2012 period) should have expanded the size of the main zone (even EAG said that they had).
As such, the results of the N43-101 do not make sense. Either the original report was incorrect or the something is missing. Whatever it is -- mgmt. should have pointed out why the discrepancy.
TomG says he has asked the question of mgmt. so lets see how they respond.
In the meantime, nothing is to be gained by "tone of voice" when what you are saying is recognized and understood.
EAG has an amazing gold field at very high assay value but the market is saying today (down $.015) that there is a problem which requires clarification by current mgmt. team.
I am very pleased with the increase in indicated but equally displeased by the lack of additional resource that should have been identified based on previous PR's.
TomG -- please post whatever response you get from mgmt.
Thx