Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

VIRGINIA HILLS OIL CORP VFGGF

"Virginia Hills Oil Corp, formerly Pinecrest Energy Inc was incorporated under the ABCA on March 24, 2006 under the name Testudo Oil & Gas Exploration Ltd. The Company is a Calgary, Alberta-based oil and natural gas exploration, production and development company with operations in the Canadian provinces of Alberta and Saskatchewan."


GREY:VFGGF - Post by User

Comment by ofirmeon Mar 03, 2014 3:54pm
101 Views
Post# 22274388

RE:Waterflood Expectations

RE:Waterflood Expectationsok, primary production in this area should yield 10%-15% of ooip. waterflooding should take you
 to 25% and repeated waterflooding will take you to 40% at the end. as the number of 
 waterflooding cycles grows, so does the watercut.
https://www.arcanres.com/investors/faqs/#faq10
Arcan has some general numbers on a different area, but it is relevant to show the expectations.
Most of the u.s oil shales (like the mississppian or even eagle ford) have high watercut to 
 begin with (mississippian in oklahoma could be 80%+), so I do not know how much 
 waterflooding can do there. I think eagle ford also have high watercut. pinecrest's has less than
 30% watercut (if my memory serves me right).
The reason why pinecrest did not hedge more than they did, is that the timing of the results is
 still not clear. we can all agree that the results should be xyz, but we need actual numbers to
 confirm. 
If you want to visualize waterflooding think of lower highes in a graph. each high equals 75% 
 or so of the former. in between you have 12-24 month of decline and than another 6-12 month
 of increase in production. 
Hope that helps.
Good luck to the company and to its shareholders.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>