RE:RE:RE:RE:New Horne 5 video and 43-101The BGM comparison is a good one. I was not aware of it as I normally do not follow stocks that are below 5.00/share, just a personal guideline. Thanks for BGM info. Why is FPC a compelling story? We assume that the estimated past costs for the existing infrastructure of tunnels etc. of 450 million is accurate. For a simple cost calculations, take $450 million/70 million o/s = 6 bucks and change. It would have cost a comparable junior that much to get to where FPC is today just to build the infrastructure. First point, management does not need to dilute shares greatly to raise capital for infrastructural development. Second point, if a company were to buy out FPC, it would be wise of management to factor in the existing infrastructure value in addition to any ounces of gold in the ground. This is why I feel that once FPC can "prove" its ounces of gold (please management, no more inferred, but get the proven and probable stuff), FPC's shares will rise in a ballistic manner. A major could step in and with very little additional capital investment start pulling ounces out of the ground. 70 million shares o/s is relatively low for a junior company and again, this is because they did not need to spend a lot on infrastructural development (it would have been premature to do so anyways) and exploration. In summary, if FPC does what is needed to move its existing approximate 2.0 million ounces from inferred to proven, this is the key to a dramatic rise in share price. This strategy would be far more effective than saying "we got another 3 million in inferred ounces". the market knows Noranda was in there big time and what the market really wants to know is if there is any gold left there that can be mined economic-wise. The market doesn't need to know about "inferred" because Noranda pulled many actual ounces. The key distinction is that this is not really an exploration play, so the market and share prices will not react as if it were. This is a junior going in after a major has pulled out million of ounces of gold, and that major left a well developed, albeit, aging, infrastructure in place. Okay, final point, the location of FPC is close to other needed infrastructures like roads, electricity and smelters. This is added value. You don't have to build roads, truck in supplies, or build a separate power line. Well, the path should be clear, get the ounces proven, then take your road on the show - but OSK or another major will likely make an offer around 5 bucks or more for this stock. I've made this a sizeable bet in my portfolio because of the many positives and if it goes even above 3.00/share then early retirement beckons. Thanks for the BGM story, I will review it more closely but again, FPC is one of those exceptions to my not going "below 3.00) guidance rule.