Barkerville Gold Mns Ltd BGMZF

RE:RE:Explanation of previous post

[yaponski]

Rollercoasterblues wrote: Your comparison shouldn't be valid since.........correct me if I am wrong.......this is the 'other half' of the core so should the combination of the full core be considered in total?......rather than a comparison. Aren't we getting additional bang for our buck and not the same core split (side) being sampled?

Either way, no offense, but I would rather listen to someone from Snowden or Apex or any specific geologist on site explaining this to me........

I appreciate your debated point of issue but I fail to see the smoking gun here!

Thanks anyway.....

Roller, 
These were NQ drill holes. Do you know the volume of a NQ core?  Differences between halfs is very interesting IMO.

At the very best your argument of combining the two halves for the full result still means that the reassay has resulted in a lower grade / gram meter figure -- you know logic, take the average of your big brain and the little brain of your leader the BBoS and you still end up with a very small brain with little common sense  :)