Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Sandstorm Metals & Energy Ltd STTYF



GREY:STTYF - Post by User

Comment by MidasMulliganon Mar 11, 2014 6:11am
362 Views
Post# 22306403

RE:Classic case of

RE:Classic case ofI don't think that a merger with SSL would be acceptable to SSL shareholders or the management. They wanted to have SSL a separate entity precisely because gold streaming companies typically enjoy a higher valuation... and SSL has been criticized even when they made back-to-back deals with SND in the past...

I think that the most sensible thing to do would be to finish the sale of coal assets, sort out GDN a CSI and use the cash to buy some new streams/royalties. According to the last conference call this seems to be the preferred course of action... If the management didn't want to issue new shares at 2-3 USD, it doesn't seems plausible that they would dilute current shareholders at current price... Last time Nolan said that he would rather wait, collect some cash and continue that way. Maybe they would be willing to issue new shares at a higher price.

Management expected to have around 10 mil. USD in cash shortly and taking into consideration the situation with CSI, the number could be a little higher, depending on the sale price of CSI (maybe around 4 mil. USD or more, if they could sell CSI for at least 50 mil. USD...). Let's say that they would be able to rise 15 mil. USD within a year. That should be enough for at least one medium sized stream (CZN?) or a few quality royalties...

I don't think that they would even consider liquidation, there is no reason for that...
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>