Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Sandstorm Metals & Energy Ltd STTYF



GREY:STTYF - Post by User

Comment by materialsgirlon Mar 11, 2014 11:10am
364 Views
Post# 22307767

RE:RE:Classic case of

RE:RE:Classic case ofMulligan;  Your reasoning seems sound.  The only point I would make is that it is unlikely that the CSI royalty will return much cash over the next several years.  They might give up the royalty altogether in return for 50% or some other share of the outstanding shares.

They would then have to wait  12 to 48 months for the mine to stabilise before the shares could be sold at a good price.   There is also a real risk that this mine may never go ahead.  A viewpoint might evolve where investors may worry about putting good money after bad.  There is no way to know that adding new management and adding $50m cash (or whatever amount) would succeed in economic production.  Many potential deposits have a fatal flaw.  This one may have a geology fatal flaw.  I am not saying that it does but rather that this may turn out to be the case.

In any case Mulligan the SSL shareholders would welcome SND into their fold like snow in July
I agree.

Mat
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>