OTCPK:MGMXD - Post by User
Comment by
bob4977on Mar 11, 2014 9:46pm
288 Views
Post# 22311037
RE:strategic direction
RE:strategic direction
Calmandquiet, you gave some interesting arguments until you inferred you understood BC politics. Site C would be a large Hydro Electric project. It would supply a large part of the expected increase in BC power needs. I agree that more power on top of that would not be necessary unless there was massive expansion of LNG. My big disagreement with that argument is that there is no appetite in BC to flood a valley in order to make Site C happen. I would bet on Butte Inlet getting approved first as run of river is so much less invasive. Bob