RE:RE:RE:RE:Explanation of previous postGoingDeeper,
I comapred each hole for the total amount assayed. in the F.A, they only assayed portions of the core that looked like it was minearlized. In the M.S. They assayed the complete length of the core including what had been assayed in the Fire Assay. You are very correct in that it would be nice to compare interval to interval, but that would be quite time consuming. All I did was see if any of the holes had a net increase or decrease. If you were to subscribe to early comments from BGM, they expected to find gold in the rock that had not been assayed before. I did see a few cases as I was going through the data, but using just a cursory view, I saw many intervals not showing any gold that had previously, let alone new gold. There are exceptions to this. It would seem to me, that when they were in the higher grade areas, they had some better results.
When you look at the data I provided, it was straight from the information that BGM provided in both the 2011 press releases and the 2014, which was to include assaying the entire length of the hole using MS Assay. It is my opinion, (and the majority of people I know in the industry that I have talked to, that the MS Assay would statistically approach almost equall if you do the correct QA/QC, don't bias your core samples, etc....
MS Assay is the premo for this, but you better understand what is happeneing. I would suggest money would be better spent re-drilling the high grade zones with at least HQ core and even better, doing some PQ core to get a beter idea of what is going on. Just an opinion...
Again, you can look at the data yourself and see that I am only presenting data that BGM did. It is possible I messed a number up, but I don't think I did... At least not significant.
I would love to take time to compare interval to interval... (Depth), but honestly, that will come to light if BGM does what it is supposed to do. For Simple analysis, the numbers actually tell quite a bit. Start thinking what happens when you cap any number over 33 grams....