Stockhouse.com uses cookies on this site. By continuing to use our service, you agree to our use of cookies. Cookies are used to offer you a better browsing experience and to analyze our traffic. We also use them to share usage information with our partners. See full details.
I Agree
×
Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

Return to Login
SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Barkerville Gold Mns Ltd BGMZF

Metals & Mining Industrial Metals & Minerals
Barkerville Gold Mines Ltd is a Canada based company operates in the business of Gold. It is engaged in the production and sale of gold, and the exploration, development, and acquisition of mineral properties in British Columbia. The mineral tenures cover approximately 2,000 square kilometres. The company primarily holds interests in Cariboo Gold Belt District, Island Mountain, Cow Mountain and Barkerville Mountain.


OTCQX:BGMZF - Post by User

Barkerville Gold Mns Ltd
Bullboard Posts
User Avatar Image
(0)
•••
Comment by yaponskion Mar 14, 2014 12:49pm
57 Views
Post# 22324149

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Explanation of previous post

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Explanation of previous post

Well, regarding


I think what you missed is that MS(A) = FA(A)



Ah, no, MS(A) is the most recent measurement of section A using a different methodology than the original FA(A).  Two different measuremens of the same section completed at different times.

While MS(A) was expected to be greater than FA(A), the results from various sections clearly show that was not the case.  And given that there is a natural occurring variance in lab measurements, which may include both random and systemic errors, I would never expect to see MS(A) = FA(A).

If you see some logical reason from why MS(A) must equal FA(A) then you haven't explained to me at least. Just saying...

It would be very nice if the BGM QPs or the responsible 3rd party QPs prepared a detailed analysis showing us the real difference negating the need for this type of analysis by investors using partial information.  

Can any one explain why BGM would not have prepared a detailed comparison of results between MS and FA?

Bullboard Posts
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities