OTCQX:BGMZF - Post by User
Comment by
hammer161on Mar 14, 2014 2:16pm
108 Views
Post# 22324863
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Explanation of previous post
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Explanation of previous post
The point is that the direct comparisons should be made NOW - they have both sets of data so why not put it up there for investors to see? If there is something material in the results they legally have to disclose it. The fact that they don't make a direct comparison right away has the wrong smell. How can anyone assume that the previously un-assayed sections are nuggety? They were probably not sampled in the first pass because they did not look altered or mineralized - so why go spending a lot of money on an advanced assay technique when you can do it a lot cheaper with regular FA? Structures that host high grade in this sort of deposit will be obvious and should not be missed.