Stockhouse.com uses cookies on this site. By continuing to use our service, you agree to our use of cookies. Cookies are used to offer you a better browsing experience and to analyze our traffic. We also use them to share usage information with our partners. See full details.
I Agree
×
Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

Return to Login
SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
News Focus
Voyageur Signs Letter of Intent with Large Multinational Pharmaceutical Company (click to learn more)
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Barkerville Gold Mns Ltd BGMZF

Metals & Mining Industrial Metals & Minerals
Barkerville Gold Mines Ltd is a Canada based company operates in the business of Gold. It is engaged in the production and sale of gold, and the exploration, development, and acquisition of mineral properties in British Columbia. The mineral tenures cover approximately 2,000 square kilometres. The company primarily holds interests in Cariboo Gold Belt District, Island Mountain, Cow Mountain and Barkerville Mountain.


OTCQX:BGMZF - Post by User

Barkerville Gold Mns Ltd
Bullboard Posts
User Avatar Image
(0)
•••
Comment by yaponskion Mar 14, 2014 2:45pm
74 Views
Post# 22325087

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Explanation of previous post

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Explanation of previous post
hammer161 wrote:
The point is that the direct comparisons should be made NOW - they have both sets of data so why not put it up there for investors to see? If there is something material in the results they legally have to disclose it. The fact that they don't make a direct comparison right away has the wrong smell. How can anyone assume that the previously un-assayed sections are nuggety? They were probably not sampled in the first pass because they did not look altered or mineralized - so why go spending a lot of money on an advanced assay technique when you can do it a lot cheaper with regular FA? Structures that host high grade in this sort of deposit will be obvious and should not be missed.


Hammer, exactly correct. 
Bullboard Posts
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities