Barkerville Gold Mns Ltd BGMZF

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Yapponski

[yaponski]

halcro wrote:

bigbab wrote:"Those happened in the past and Sprott hasn't turfed management. What legal grounds would Sprott have to turf management? "

Hey HAL-tard....Sprott is a RECENT investor into the BGM story......including 8% of the common equity and likely much more after the recent "Non-brokered" PP. (and a wack-load of warrants) It's called A SPECIAL MEETING....like the ones you attend in the facility but slightly different. At these meeting Sprott might be able to do what Rexx Harbour could not ...(you know Harbour right, the ones who did such a GREAT JOB with mightly MAO ..your favorite stock) ...yes much like the TSX being LEGALLY closed for trade on certain holidays...Sprott is LEGALLY allowed to call a special meeting to address changing mgmt if things are not up to snuff.....

got it CHUMP ?

Erm...BigBagO,,,better shake that shartz out from between your ears, as it’s impeding your extremely limited reasoning processes, O-shartz-for-brains forum leader.

Back in December, 2012, when there was a dissident-initiated court action, you babbled ceaselessly about Sprott’s eight-million-plus BGM shareholding.

On October 9, 2013 (which was before the more-than-a-year CTO was lifted), BGM announced the closing of the Sprott-associated gold loan and the granting of nine million warrants. This was confirmed by the report (part 4 of National Instrument 62-103) filed by Sprott Asset Management LP on November 8, 2013, confirming that it held, in one or more managed accounts, 7,878,192 BGM shares and those nine million gold-loan warrants.

You knew that Sprott had almost eight million shares prior to the dissident court filing in November, 2012, and, because BGM was CTO’d on August 14, 2012, and there is no record of Sprott purchases in 2012 prior to the CTO, Sprott would have purchased its 7,878,192 shares prior to December 31, 2011.

Using your twisted and error-filled logic, then because Sprott hasn’t (legally or illegally) called A SPECIAL MEETING at any time since December 31, 2011, then Sprott must have felt no need to do so, thereby lending tacit support to BGM management.

You see, shartz for brainz, YOUR interpretation of “RECENT investor in the BGM story” doesn’t bear up under reasoned scrutiny...AND EVEN YOU ARE NOW CALLING BGM A STORY!!! When will you slip even further and call it a FAIRY TALE?

There's another new sphincter for you, BigBagO. How many is that you’ve got now...two dozen or so? You must leak shartz like a sieve when you waddle around.

Halcro,
I am fully expecting that the BBoS wants to register for the last pick that door game, but he sees the huge pile up at Door #3 (record full year net loss) and doesn't want to be accused of being a crowd follower.

With his sharting abilities, the BBoS always needs to be out front to avoid the back end problems that are, well so very obvious...

The BBoS Leading His Crew of Shart Eaters