RE:RE:RE:RE:higher dividends are coming I've never got hung up on the capacity utilization rate thing at Syncrude and I blame them in a sense for setting expectations too high. Anyone who has worked in a heavy industry environment knows that achieving 85% of nameplate capacity is about average when you factor in planned and unplanned downtime. But oil and gas analysts dump on COS for not achieving 100% of nameplate which betrays they know little about this sort of work environment. They are in love with drill bits and not trucks and shovels. As for the capex thing, the NI 51-101 released in Feb illustrates under the "Future development costs" header the following costs which I take to be capital- 2014- $1.143B, 2015-$825M, 2016-$765M, 2017-$784M, 2018-$707M. This is not the story line COS has been feeding us. If you look at last years NI 51-101 these figures were- 2014-$1.239B, 2015-$573M, 2016-$419M, 2017-$401M. This is the story line COS has been feeding us.