Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Southern Pacific Resource Corp STPJF

Southern Pacific Resource Corp. is a Canada-based company, which is engaged in the thermal production of heavy oil in Senlac, Saskatchewan on a property known as STP-Senlac, and thermal production of bitumen on a property located in the Athabasca region of Alberta known as STP-McKay, as well as exploration for and development of in-situ oil sands in the Athabasca region of Alberta. Its STP-McKay property consists of oil sands leases totaling approximately 37,760 acres. The Company’s operations also include Anzac, Hangingstone and Ells. The Company’s STP-McKay property is located approximately 45 kilometers northwest Ft. McMurray. The Anzac project covers approximately 117 kilometers of two-dimensional (2D) seismic. The Company owns 80% interest in Hangingstone project. The Ells project covers approximately 164 kilometers of two-dimensional (2D) seismic.


GREY:STPJF - Post by User

Comment by Eyeinvestoron Mar 30, 2014 9:51pm
265 Views
Post# 22388369

RE:RE:Production forecast and the future

RE:RE:Production forecast and the future
Eye is very positive on STP but forecasts a different route to success. #1 There may be some production from Pad 1 but I don't think it will be a successful Pad in the near term. I don't think Pad 1 matters. IP5 is useful data BUT doubling fluid on a well that was producing sub 50bbd is not making us rich. 1P2 and 1P4 monthly numbers suggest to the Eye that they are either shut down or on the verge of being shut down, and ICDs would not have any immediate impact. IP3 and IP6 maybe some potential for ICDs but added on to 1P5 that is 3 wells out of 6, and all three together wont add as much production as adding ICDs to one well on Pad 2. Eye wants STP to pick the low hanging fruit FIRST. #2 Contrast the shape of pad 2 production on a well by well basis. ICDs could have much more immediate and positive impact on these wells . Eye would want to see STP focus 100% of their first ICD efforts on Pad 2. Eye's picks would be 2P2, 2P5 and 2P6.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>