RE:Nat Rea was rightThe real question is why didn't Nat Rae make these changes when he was a significant shareholder and on the board.
Seems strange to do this after the fact. Doesn't have much credibility in my opinion, especially given his small holding.
I compare this board fight to the one going on at Sherritt now with Clarke and Clarke's seems so much more credible. This one, just seems vindictive.