Canada Carbon Inc V.CCB

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Government agencies to receive report.

[battleforest]

Salty5 wrote:

geeraf1 wrote: Bob, I would think that the on site geo and QP would try to understand and recognize first how consistent the geology is in and around these pods, and as a result of that observation, would make sure that they cut an appropriate representative sample out of their bulk sample that would qualify for mill feed. Nothing else would make sense to me.  And this goes for each stage of the optimization process or you're wasting your money.  It's all about continuous accurate sampling.  This applies to all mining exploration companies, whether it be gold, copper, etc.

WRT the size of 50kg, a lot of bench scale testwork will likely be done on very small samples, maybe less that 100g,  again cut out as accurately as possible to represent the whole 50kg.  The labs use rifflers for this purpose and they come in all shapes and sizes, depending on the application.

Exactly right, and if you analyse what the basic preamble points out,  SGS has already done many of the prior grab samples including caustic roast and thermal benefication resulting in 99.9978 % purity. Now this sample, taken by the QP, is to prove reliability and repeatability of the true representation of the orebody. When the full bulk sample is milled, there is always room for improvement and that takes place in any milling regime. It is a process of continuous improvement, and in milling ore is usually a weekly evaluation looking for a bottlenck or alternative process.  S

...and there is definitely some relevant historical statistics kicking around out there on record pertaining to the original Miller Mine.