RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Getting interesting.....goldn1 wrote:
The problem with the PEA will be that it will not be based on FFE commercial separation. But any good news will be welcome. I didn't take it as you questioning me, I am a large shareholder and have lost a bunch on paper, I am confident this stock will come back, but management made a mistake by masking what was basically a revolutionary breakthrough in REE separation. That is why the stock is trading at. 35, news came out and no one took notice. I would be even more pis*sed if I was in the latest PP and I had my shares locked up at. 60, those people can't trade around this uncertainty if they wanted to. I am surprised the funds who participated aren't buying at these low levels to reduce their basis. 30 days from now we will all be in better moods, but, in my opinion, they blew it on the last NR. I believe Ucore got over 100 million to develop there mine and they still use a solvent for separation. GMA needs to make some noise regarding their technology, again, in my opinion, Montveil is worthless if they can use FFE separation, plus recycling opportunities will be worth a lot more than Montveil as it is more cost effective and they can start as soon as the prototype is scaled up... G1
One day the sep will be incorporated into the PEA and what a doozy it'll prove to be.....but that a long way off (1-2yr?).
G1 have you voiced your concern to Simon about his wording of press releases? Does he get it? Will he smarten up for our next sep update? T