Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Mart Resources Inc MAUXF



OTCPK:MAUXF - Post by User

Post by ncideron May 28, 2014 5:12pm
344 Views
Post# 22607349

The Petroleum Act doesn't make sense

The Petroleum Act doesn't make senseSchedule 1 of the Petroleum Act states:

10. The term of an oil mining lease shall not exceed twenty years, but may be renewed in accordance with this Act.

Yet two paragraphs later it states:

12. (1) Ten years after the grant of an oil mining lease, one half of the area of the lease shall be relinquished.


If an OML is granted for 20 years, which paragraph 10 clearly allows, how can paragraph 12(1) come into effect after only 10 years without violating the grant of the OML? Does this mean that every 10 years the area of the OML gets halved? Who decides which half?

There must be more to this than what's in the Petroluem Act itself because it make no sense. I find it hard to believe the Shell lawyers didn't have this covered when they originally applied for the OML.

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>