Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Southern Pacific Resource Corp STPJF

Southern Pacific Resource Corp. is a Canada-based company, which is engaged in the thermal production of heavy oil in Senlac, Saskatchewan on a property known as STP-Senlac, and thermal production of bitumen on a property located in the Athabasca region of Alberta known as STP-McKay, as well as exploration for and development of in-situ oil sands in the Athabasca region of Alberta. Its STP-McKay property consists of oil sands leases totaling approximately 37,760 acres. The Company’s operations also include Anzac, Hangingstone and Ells. The Company’s STP-McKay property is located approximately 45 kilometers northwest Ft. McMurray. The Anzac project covers approximately 117 kilometers of two-dimensional (2D) seismic. The Company owns 80% interest in Hangingstone project. The Ells project covers approximately 164 kilometers of two-dimensional (2D) seismic.


GREY:STPJF - Post by User

Comment by bmofoshizzon May 28, 2014 8:53pm
251 Views
Post# 22607949

RE:RE:RE:RE:My, My People - Have some faith?

RE:RE:RE:RE:My, My People - Have some faith?Nike, good post. I appreciate your insights on commons vs. debs. 

I'm thinking there is an issue with the logic on a deal being contingent on 2P5 ICD though. If the strategic review is contingent upon further successful ICD installation, they'll have to issue a news release stating they are now proceeding with additional installs, as this contradicts the previous guidance ('delaying installation until conclusion of strategic review'). Given they have already flip-flopped from proceeding with work plan to a no-go once since the new loan, I don't anticipate that they will reverse the plan again to proceed with ICD installs prior to the end of the strategic review.

For that reason, I think they will announce the close of the strategic review shortly. That being said, I don't think Lutes and co., despite their change of control bonuses, would be holding off installs and drilling at Senlac for a lowball offer. If it was sub 0.5, why wouldn't they tell the potential acquirer to go kick stones and continue on the work plan? It must be a somewhat agreeable offer, or else it would be business as usual trying to increase production above break even as soon as possible. The ~120 MM of institutional ownership probably wouldn't bite at sub 0.5 either (Sageview and Invesco etc.)

With respect to the seemingly experimental wording in the 2P5 application, this is usually intentional as it gives the applicant optionality in the install and doesn't bind them to one type of liner or another. 

Just some thoughts on your solid discussion Nike. Thanks. 
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>