sounds like CAFC on 01 sideMajor takeaways:
1.logm argument on different software performing different functions "ARTIFICIAL"
2. logm gateway (the middle piece) doing something not enough to infringe? "DOUBTFUL" --the bridge impassable without it.
3. 01 objection on not charging the appropriate language to the jury was imappropriately ignored by the trial judge.
Let's see what happens next. If CFAC affirms, the judgement should come fairly quickly, usually withing a week. If not, and there is a writeup, we probably will have part affirm, part reverse, and part remand. 01 looks very much alive in this case after this oral argument. Good luck. Never mind the sell off. MM manipulation. my 2 cents.