Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

TELESTA THERAPEUTICS INC T.TST

"Telesta Therapeutics Inc is a biopharmaceutical company. The Company is engaged in the research, development, manufacturing and commercialization of human health products and technologies."


TSX:TST - Post by User

Post by beechguyon Jun 04, 2014 1:06pm
391 Views
Post# 22629563

Acquisition / FDA protocol

Acquisition / FDA protocolFor those of you concerned about the line of making acquisition, do you really think a guy who is selling everything not bolted down and firing everyone including senior management is going to go out and acquire assets with our current state of affairs? No chance. They are referring to making acquisition after up front funds are in place. Berendt and Olds are not idiots. June is a huge month for shareholders if the FDA trial protocol is in fact set. That means potential suitors can look at this trial and know what the odds are of success. We know that a Papillary trial (most prevalent and most likely) as opposed to In Situ, with 8mm doses immediate post TURBT instillation should produce a CRR result in the 40%-50% range. That is miles above the FDA 20% (likely - if same as first phase 3) threshold. So if the trial protocol comes back as Papillary Post Turbt, you can bet your life (investment) that a partner won't be far behind, with lots of upfront funds to carry us through. If for some reason they want a In Situ trial to run concurrently for a separate cancer then fine. The only thing we don't want is an In Situ trial only, which would make no sense as it is the rarer of the two cancers. beech
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>