Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Coniagas Battery Metals Inc. T.COS


Primary Symbol: V.COS Alternate Symbol(s):  CNBMF

Coniagas Battery Metals Inc. is a Canada-based exploration and mining company. The Company is focused on nickel, copper, and cobalt in northern Quebec. It is advancing Graal Nickel & Copper Project. The Graal Nickel & Copper Project (the Property) is located in the north of Saguenay Lac St-Jean region. It is comprised of 110 map-designed claims covering 6,113 hectares. The Property is also located at 190 kilometers (km) north from the seaport terminal of Grande-Anse (Saguenay).


TSXV:COS - Post by User

Comment by goldmansuckson Jun 16, 2014 5:25pm
253 Views
Post# 22664752

RE:RE:RE:RE:New Mine Train

RE:RE:RE:RE:New Mine Train
I think you will find that Suncor has the same capacity utilization rate that COS does.  They just have more assets so don't need to talk about it.  There is an unhealthy focus on why Syncrude cannot achieve nameplate capacity.  No one can.  It is typical for a heavy industrial operation to take a two week maintenance shutdown and spend 2-3 days winding down and 3-4 days winding back up making it an effective 3 week shut down.  In effect 6% of nameplate capacity is given away every year.  Queueing issues and unplanned downtime usually wipes out a further 5-8%.   The other issue, which COS does not have to deal with is a lack of market for all output at certain times of the year.  But add it all up and you get an 87.3% capacity utilization rate for mines as you can see here....

https://www.federalreserve.gov/RELEASES/G17/current/default.htm

350,000 x 87.3%-= 305,550.   So if Syncrude lifts their game to here I am fine with it. 
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>