RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Macro Environment takes a byte from LNG prospectsJackroy wrote: Thanks - agreed, CT should get some business. The description is massive given the 12MM in top line revenue
Hey Backward, Above is a statement from you buddy Jack agreeing that Calgary tunnelling will get work.
I think where the disagreement between my view and where Jack is coming from is:
Jack is looking at the E business units in the stage at which they were purchased
I am looking at the potential of the business units, and its just my opinion. The mangement of E is way more agressive than the ma and pa's that ran the individual companies. E mgmt is agressively building with the LNG buildout in mind.
- increasing Hart rentals - for the increase in LNG drilling that is happening
- Increasing AT for pipeline work - heating the pipeline
- Adding Tunneling technology for pipeline crossings
Judging from their recent director addition they will continue to agressively grow the company.
Lets hope they aren't over agressive, I wouldn't want to see another another massive share dilution.