RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Spsavage, touche', very fair on your part as well. I have no sour grapes with gwg/gwmgf, ya' win some, ya' lose some, I came out with my a$$ in tact. I stopped believing there, when past management indicated "fully funded", then failed to build out their vision. They then left the company for various sketchy reasons imo, and then what do you know, showed up about a year later at Star Minerals, and had some dealing with gwg. Huh?! :/
Past management had aggressive expectations, and from them, in theory, should have, if all went as anticipated, the "vision" built and operating by late LAST year. But hey, things don't always go as planned. But the drivle that is spewed on the gwg board, with some claiming that they'd be profitable, LAST year, about how close they were "allegedly" in terms of building the vision, and now, for the last year, claims of "folks lining up" to fund them. :/
From what I can tell, they probably need something like 100m and/or a tolling agreement (something else that's been babbled about ad nauseum, but seemingly led to nothing apparent ly positive at this point, as well, hence the low pps). A reverse split has also been on the table for a long time, and some there try to convince others about how that would be a good thing. It goes on, and on, and on, so ya', when I see something that I believe is canival barker-ish, I chime in.
I compare TC to gwg in some respects, as both had ambitious expectations, both needed more money, both wanted to build out world class facilities, and become profitable. I even tried to throw some there a bone back when TC was sub $2, but they saw "no value" and that's fine. What isn't fine, is their condescending, arrogant, deceitful posts, making flat out lies. If they wanna' post FACTS here, so be it. If not, I'll continue to call em' on it, both here and there. Take care.