RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:STKThanks. That is news to me that Crane offered up that reasoning. It would be informative if Crane, whom I am confident reads these bullboards, would explain why he thinks Gibson would "corporate raid" Strike. Keeping in mind that Gibson went to Waterton to cean up Strikes debt and then expected to finsnce the Edwards, how does that compute with Cranes logic? What great assets besides the Edwards does Strike have to sell off? I am inclined to see his logic as evidence towards his incompetence in mining. As further evidence Crane spread the word when he fired Roger Dent that he had the financing in place and therefore did not need Roger. (Crane says it was mutual agreement). Then Cran spread the word that he had a portabe mill lined up. One goof after another.