RE:RE:I DON'T LIKE IT ONE BIT!!!I realize companies in financial trouble will do a reverse split. Also I know people will run when they hear reverse split! The insinuation is enough to get the ball rolling....... downhill. So instead of a 3 for 1 reverse we will need to do a 4 for 1 or 5 for 1. Bottom line....... it sucks. Some one earlier mentioned that they may not reverse split, that they are just getting the paper work out of the way for a possible quick listing on the NAS. I'll bet a buck for each .10 that this is a fore gone conclusion. Get some licenses and agreements going and we'll be up to their magic 4.00. Healthy companies have great results with reverse splits you say, well I think they are probably a lot further along the revenue line than we are at the moment. We have GOT to prove this thing works and get some licensing revenue, period. I'm not bashing Poet, I'm bashing the reverse split as I have never seen nor been involved with one that works. Reverse splits have a stigma to them that no one likes, and as one who has been burned six or seven times already, I look a it as another manipulation from the BOD to "somehow" move themselves along while the rest of us are left behind with reduced shares and value. Sorry but for me it just means get your azzes moving and do your job. I've done mine by buying PTK shares with my hard earned money. Again, I say NO to the manipulation of shares.