Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Puda Coal Inc PUDA

Puda Coal, Inc. (Puda) is a supplier of high-grade metallurgical coking coal to the industrial sector in the People’s Republic of China (the PRC or China). Its processed coking coal is primarily purchased by coke and steel producers for the purpose of making the coke required for the steel manufacturing process. Puda’s operations are conducted by Shanxi Puda Coal Group Co., Ltd (Shanxi Coal), which it controls through 90% indirect equity ownership. Puda cleans raw coking coal sourced from third-party coal mines primarily located in Liulin County, Shanxi Province, and markets the cleaned, coking coal to coke and steel makers. Its primary geographic markets include Shanxi Province, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Hebei Province, Beijing and Tianjin, China. It purchases raw coal from a diversified pool of local coal mines in Shanxi Province.


GREY:PUDA - Post by User

Comment by coldheaton Jul 14, 2014 3:44pm
117 Views
Post# 22743877

RE:Motion to dismiss count IV by Brean and McQuarie is Denied

RE:Motion to dismiss count IV by Brean and McQuarie is Denied
Some analysis......This motion was made in regard to the facts regarding what is now called "The Kroll Report" that was distributed to the defendants 6 days before the Puda Prospectus was released. The legal hurdle to get the motion approved was to show that the charge was unreasonable, or that a reasonable person would conclude that it is not proper, based on evidence and that the Underwriters had no intent to defraud. The judge essentially made the case that the underwriters were aware of the contents of the Kroll report and that they chose to ignore it.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>