Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Balmoral Resources Ltd BALMF

Balmoral Resources Ltd is an exploration stage mining exploration and development company. It is engaged in the acquisition and exploration of gold and base metal properties in Canada. The principal focus of the company's exploration activities are the properties comprising its Detour Trend Project in Quebec.


OTCQX:BALMF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by goindeeperon Jul 17, 2014 9:56am
283 Views
Post# 22754699

Conversion from Ni to Au equivalent

Conversion from Ni to Au equivalent
For those that may have missed it when they gave up reading.  From:

https://www.balmoralresources.com/s/Grasset.asp?ReportID=650193

It is always difficult to compare the potential value of different deposit types, in particular when multiple metals are involved. To provide a relative sense of how say a 10 g/t gold intercept compares to a 1% nickel intercept we often resort to a gold or nickel equivalent calculation. There are several assumptions built into these types of calculations which mean they are far from perfect comparisons and as they are typically based on metal prices they are a snap shot in time. They also assume 100% metal recoveries which clearly make them "non-real world" as no deposits exhibit 100% recovery of actual assay values.

At current metal prices (April 29, 2014) of $8.30 per lbs for nickel and $1300 per ounce gold a rock containing 1% nickel, on a 100% recovered basis, would be equal in terms of recovered value to a rock containing 4.38 g/t gold on the same 100% recovered basis. Obviously most nickel deposits contain significant copper, platinum, palladium or other recoverable minerals which then ultimately add to the potential value of the intercept. For example, again on a 100% recoverable basis adding 0.10% copper (at $3.20 copper), 0.15 g/t platinum (at $1400/ounce platinum) and 0.35 g/t palladium (at $800/ounce palladium) to the same rock adds a potential value of 0.53 g/t gold equivalent to this same rock (for 4.91 g/t gold equivalent). These numbers serve only as a guideline to assist in making a comparison and should not be relied on in making any form of investment decision.

For the calculations above:

The gold grade equivalent used is as follows: Gold Equiv. (g/t) = (Ni grade x ((Ni price per lb/Au price per ounce) x 0.0686 lbs per oz x 10000 g per %)) + (Cu grade x ((Cu price per lb/Au price per ounce) x 0.0686 lbs per oz x 10000 g per %)) + (Pt grade x (Pt price per oz/Au price per oz)) + (Pd grade x (Pd price per oz/Au price per oz))

The metal prices used were: Gold $1300/oz, Nickel, $8.30/lbs, Copper $3.00/lbs, Platinum $1400/oz, Palladium $800/oz


Does anyone have a rule of thumb for when a borehole interval indicates that a mine is basically economic at first glance? Such as "3 m interval of 1% Ni is always the minimum underground minable width, assuming adequate overall extent and tonnage to make a mine viable."


Bullboard Posts