RE:RE:RE:RE:1.59 g/t Gold and 0.48% Cu Over 130.9 Metres From Surface...
How can you defend the practice of only highlighting good results?
To evalute the potential of the target i am very eager to know where every drill hole is and not only the good holes.
Lets look at Kdr013:
From 2 to 18 meters you have aprox. 0,25% cuequivalent. This may be economic if it is oxidized otherwise not. The rest of the mineralization is even lower grade and starts at 70meters depth. This is for sure not ecnomic. Just look at Copper porphyrys around and you will realize that you should have at least 0,4% Cuequi. to make a deposit economic. And i am talking about projects with good infrastructure and low strip ratio.
Just look at our Halilaga project: The Cuequi grade is slightly under 0,5%. Can you imagine what the PEA would look like if the grade was 0,35%? Not good i guess...
The good thing is that there seems to be a high grade core of unkown dimension(looks rather small) which can help to reduce the payback time if this ever becomes a mine.