Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Cohen & Steers Tax-Adv Pref Secs and Inc Fund V.PTA


Primary Symbol: PTA

The Funds primary investment objective is high current income. The Funds secondary investment objective is capital appreciation The Fund seeks to achieve its investment objectives by investing at least 80% of its managed assets (i.e., net assets plus assets obtained through leverage) in a portfolio of preferred and other income securities issued by U.S. and non-U.S. companies, which may be either exchange-traded or available over-the-counter. In pursuing its investment objectives, the Fund seeks to achieve favorable after-tax returns for its shareholders by seeking to minimize the U.S. federal income tax consequences on income generated by the Fund. There can be no assurance that the Fund will achieve its investment objectives.


NYSE:PTA - Post by User

Comment by Buzzgroveon Jul 22, 2014 4:32pm
317 Views
Post# 22771245

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:37.5 mil trade

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:37.5 mil trademrpanick, you are correct that cross trading is not a legal exercise in Canada. Still, the Canadian market is not without its loopholes. There is that which is legal and that which is legally defensible. I still maintain that it was a major SRN doing some housecleaning. The trade size and proximity to the merger is too much of a coincidence. All moot anyways. At best it is a 'nice to know.'
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>