RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:AGG facts and valuations if they deliver - big time upside Treetop, maybe I'm stupid but I just don't quite understand your last comments and the basis for them. Specifically can you elaborate what is the science behind your assertion that "statistically it is equally likely to decrease the grade". The bulk sample program took actual drill holes and rather than just sampling a portion of the hole, the entire hole was tested and assayed with the results of the whole hole compared to a small fraction of the whole. You're talking 30kg or so per 2 metres, so 1 tonne = 70 metres of hole. It is completely false to say "handpicked locations" as the program used all remaining core. I think this was stupid as they had to then get another sample for met testing but it shows there was no selectivity. I'd really like to debate the risks of the project with people, I have many thoughts but lets try to stick to facts rather than imagination. I also think its unfair to attack my credibility because I use the term "proven nugget effect." Until you actually mine a deposit you can never be certain of a nugget effect but the work done here proves something is going on with a high level of certainty. Every investor in this company understands this issue is of significance so it would be stupid to ignore it. The best approach is to treat the nugget effect as a scenario which is exactly what I have done.