RE:RE:RE:OK Don and Julie: How About An Update????I'm curious too.
The only information I have seen about the post-hoc meta analysis of MACE that was worrying was a statement in one of the articles in Seeking Alpha that said that the MACE data was only based on about 60 patients....
Assuming this is true, I personally thought that that information was probably outweighed by the diabetes MACE data in the July 23rd news release. That MACE data (if I remember right) was based upon 200 patients (across two studies). Thus, the sample size is much larger and hence it should be much more reliable data.
Of course, I'm out of my comfort zone as I am not a scientist. But other than that, I'm not aware of any data that seriously calls into question the MACE findings. That doesn't mean it doesn't exist, it just means I have not seen it. Hence, I'm curious if I missed something.