OTCQX:BGMZF - Post by User
Comment by
hammer161on Aug 14, 2014 9:12pm
202 Views
Post# 22844579
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Fast Forward to Novermber (3 months)
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Fast Forward to Novermber (3 months)
WS - You can make up any hypothetical situation you want. It does not make sense that if a drill hole pierced a mineralized zone as in your first scenario to leave it un-sampled. The same for your second scenario if the entire length of the other four holes is sampled why not sample the other one in entirety too? If you go and look at the sections that are available for CM (they are of poor quality as always with BGM report graphics) you will probably see that the holes have been sampled as they intersected a series of veins or mineralized zones with gaps left un-sampled in between. They were probably left un-sampled as they appeared un-mineralized as I said before. As you say the gaps may contain a little gold, but that does not make it economic or recoverable if the grade is very low. Nor does this infill sampling increase drill hole density as they are still the same distance apart. Will you get some more indicated resources - perhaps - but my point to BB was that there will most likely not be the wholesale conversion of 4Moz (or more) from inferred to indicated as he suggests.