RE:RE:RE:RE:What did the "blackout" news do to the price?Charlie99 wrote: aiminvestor wrote: Charlie99 wrote: HA! Caught you in another LIE!!! Sucker!
https://agoracom.com/ir/steliasmines/forums/discussion/topics/468044-blackout/messages/1512790
The news of the blackout started at AGORACOM with KEMO! Well, perhaps Kemo is Primed24. No one ever answered that question for me! If Primed24 and Kemo are the same person I stand corrected. Otherwise you are a LIAR! Oh man, I got you good!
aiminvestor wrote:
St. Elias Mines (SLI) – BLACKOUT!
The rumors of SLI being on BLACKOUT for the next 10 days are no rumor. It is indeed very trues and there are MULTIPLE news releases pending during those 10 days. For there to be a black out the news has to be considered material. We have been waiting months for news from SLI and the biggest news that investors have been waiting for is DRILL PERMITS! There are no guarantees but do yourself a favor and watch this stock VERY closely for the next 10 days.
Good Luck
Steve
| Mar 2, 2011 | 2.50 | 2.53 | 2.46 | 2.48 | 144,400 | 2.48 |
| Mar 1, 2011 | 2.50 | 2.50 | 2.44 | 2.50 | 134,200 | 2.50 |
| Feb 28, 2011 | 2.50 | 2.54 | 2.43 | 2.43 | 250,400 | 2.43 |
| Feb 25, 2011 | 2.53 | 2.55 | 2.38 | 2.53 | 420,000 | 2.53 |
| Feb 24, 2011 | 2.45 | 2.55 | 2.31 | 2.50 | 259,400 | 2.50 |
| Feb 23, 2011 | 2.55 | 2.55 | 2.25 | 2.39 | 549,100 | 2.39 |
| Feb 22, 2011 | 2.50 | 2.73 | 2.41 | 2.51 | 991,900 | 2.51 |
| Feb 18, 2011 | 2.29 | 2.45 | 2.25 | 2.41 | 719,200 | 2.41 |
| Feb 17, 2011 | 2.07 | 2.25 | 2.01 | 2.20 | 692,500 | 2.20 |
| Feb 16, 2011 | 1.98 | 2.16 | 1.97 | 2.08 | 1,159,200 | 2.08 |
| Feb 15, 2011 | 1.78 | 1.95 | 1.78 | 1.95 | 873,100 | 1.95 |
| Feb 14, 2011 | 1.75 | 1.78 | 1.75 | 1.78 | 259,200 | 1.78 |
| Feb 11, 2011 | 1.74 | 1.77 | 1.73 | 1.74 | 122,100 | 1.74 |
| Feb 10, 2011 | 1.78 | 1.78 | 1.74 | 1.78 | 83,100 | 1.78 |
| Feb 9, 2011 | 1.78 | 1.78 | 1.75 | 1.78 | 72,600 | 1.78 |
| Feb 8, 2011 | 1.78 | 1.78 | 1.76 | 1.77 | 85,100 | 1.77 |
| Feb 7, 2011 | 1.75 | 1.78 | 1.72 | 1.78 | 113,700 | 1.78 |
| Feb 4, 2011 | 1.73 | 1.78 | 1.73 | 1.76 | 50,200 | 1.76 |
| Feb 3, 2011 | 1.74 | 1.75 | 1.71 | 1.72 | 129,300 | 1.72 |
" Oh man, I got you good!"
Excuse me?
As you have no idea who "Kemo" is, and neither do I, how exactly have you "got me"?
I am referring to Primed's report, dated 15th February 2011, published as FACT!
I am not interested or concerned about BB rumours posted by anonymous individuals, I am quoting The Primed report written by a "Steve" and available to anyone on the web. https://web.archive.org/web/20110917021522/https://primed24.wordpress.com/2011/02/15/st-elias-mines-sli-blackout/
Do you have the time that Primed24 published his article? You claim he published it on the 15th and that was the day that the stock price began to climb. If he published it AFTER hours then the price started to climb on the Agoracom post and not Primed24's post. So again, I have you in another lie!!! Busting you up is great fun!
OK, we'll take this one step at a time! "Do you have the time that Primed24 published his article?
No I don't, the article on HIS WEBSITE is dated 15th February 2011. (Do YOU have the time it was posted?)
And why aren't you asking Primed? It's his blog, and afterall, and he posts here! " You claim he published it on the 15th and that was the day that the stock price began to climb"
No I don't "CLAIM", that is the date on HIS WEBSITE!
https://web.archive.org/web/20110917021522/https://primed24.wordpress.com/2011/02/15/st-elias-mines-sli-blackout/ So HIS WEBSITE is where you want to take issue if you disagree with the date! "If he published it AFTER hours then the price started to climb on the Agoracom post and not Primed24's post."
The significant rise WITH VOLUME occurred on the 16th February, not the 15h!
So, if you accuse the Kemo post of 14th February of causing the rise, how do you explain that the stock didn;t really rise with volume until the 16th?
regardless fo the timing of the relaeas of the Primed Reprt, we are agreed it was the 15th! " So again, I have you in another lie"
So you start a sentence with "IF he published it after hours", (So obviously you have no idea!), and end with accusing me of lying!
How does that work then?
Come on you're making this too easy!