Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Peregrine Diamonds Ltd. PGDIF

"Peregrine Diamonds Ltd is a diamond exploration and development company with interests in diamond exploration properties located at Nunavut and the Northwest Territories in Canada and The Republic of Botswana."


GREY:PGDIF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by Kidlapikon Aug 24, 2014 1:28pm
137 Views
Post# 22872878

RE:RE:RE:Here are the facts

RE:RE:RE:Here are the factsRobert Friedland has picked up the majority of his shares around 0.40c mark. He will exercise all his Rights, warrants and buy up any extras.

His average after all that is said and done will be around 0.30c mark. Maybe I am wrong here but wouldnt he have to sell those shares to be able to claim the loss?

If the company gets down below 0.10c who is going to purchase the shares in that volume in order for Eric, Robert and Ned to claim the loss?

If they privatize they will have to purchase more shares, not sell their own. Im having a hard time understanding this Tax Loss angle. You are saying that Eric, Robert, Ned, and the entire board (who are fully participating) are better off running the share price down in order to sell their shares at a loss in order to off-set their gains somewhere else than they are to develop this asset that even at the center portion of the top 250m of CH-6 is 7mil carats at $213 average for $1.4billion in-situ, $1.5billion in-situ at DO-27, the 10million tons inferred, the BHP database and the other host of other exploration targets?

Ok you go with that angle I will go with the less James Bondy one.
Bullboard Posts