GREY:STPJF - Post by User
Comment by
ShatnersRugon Sep 03, 2014 8:13am
330 Views
Post# 22900173
RE:RE:RE:RE:STP Debs vs. The Rest
RE:RE:RE:RE:STP Debs vs. The Rest
Monzie, the results of the ICDs are already in. Their effect on well performance is marginal at best.
870 bbl/d from the 3 existing wells for the month of July. It's just not enough.
I can understand seeing any glass as half full.... and generally speaking, I myself am an optimist, but how many times does one need to get kicked in the teeth to figure out that these guys are done?
What if all of McKay's lands have a clay content that is juuuuust a tad too high thus restricting optimal extraction? Take the 870 figure from July and let's assume that 1P5 on Pad 1 is a complete bust(0 production). That would mean 435 bbl/d from the 2 wells on Pad 2. Less than 50% of nameplate WITH ICDs. SAGD is an expensive method of oil extraction, and given the current company debt, it doesn't make sense to move forward at McKay. The metrics don't make sense.
Not as far as I'm concerned anyway. I'm quite fond of the few teeth that I have left.