RE:RE:RE:Question - DOE Study - Natural v SyntheticQuincey wrote
Brilliant observation!!!
That first remark may have been right, but the rest of your post is pure fairy tale.
But, way to go Q, giving yourself 5 stars and my post one star ---- lol.
Never ceases to amaze me how these zenners can take everything completely out of context and spin it into the most amazing positive news possible.
I now have a new name for the zenners - the Cult of ZEN (trademarked).
Let me connect the dots for you - it is so much more logical than your fairy tale.
1. This study began in October 2011.
2. Was ZEN included as an original collaborator? Not very likely.
3. In 2013, one of the evaluation studies involved a ConocoPhillips A12 anode.
4. In Late 2013, Dr. Chahar left his position as Global Product and Marketing Manager at a subsidiary of ConocoPhilllips and joined ZEN as VP Market Development.
5. Since Dr. Chahar was most likely fully aware of the ORNL studies, he may have petitioned ORNL to have ZEN added to their list of collaborators.
Here's another hint.
In those two studies, can you point to any reference of ZEN graphite samples?
I didn't find any, but I sure did find reference to Superior Graphite.
Why would you "assume" the role of ZEN graphite in this study.
Why not just read the presentation ???
Too difficult, might have to face reality ??
This study ends at the end of September (yup, in 24 days, and there are only two tasks remaining (page 4).
Sure dosen't look like ZEN playing any major role.
Bottom Line: ZEN is there to get access to research papers and build network contacts.