Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Lightstream Resources Ltd. LSTMF

"Lightstream Resources Ltd is engaged in the exploration and development of oil and natural gas in Western Canada. Its operating areas include Southeastern Saskatchewan, Central Alberta, and North-Central Alberta."


GREY:LSTMF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by JohnDDon Oct 01, 2014 11:53am
237 Views
Post# 22986839

RE:Earnings are likely to disappoint

RE:Earnings are likely to disappoint


Cadillaccoupe said: "They'll likely only produce 35-36 thousand barrels of oil and capex will come in over budget at 600 million."

No doubt the company has struggled with execution, but i think the scenario you paint is beyond a worst case scenario - at least on the capex front.

The company has stated that they will be around $500 million in capex this year give or take 5% and will have a sustainabilty ratio less than 100%.  I see no scenario that they would ever hit anything close to $600 million this year. They even cut spending on the additional swan hills wells - which from a management oversight was prudent.

With respect to this quarter's production, that could surely dissappoint and that could be what is concerning the market. They cranked up their corporate decline rate from the high twenties to 30% after the latest disspoistion so that likely didn't help. Plus the asset sale is effective begining of the Q so that is a negative for the Q - if I recall correctly.

The uncertainity with Swan Hills is also not helping. Will be interesting to see what the technical review concludes, but my assumption is they likely they didn't drill and complete the wells properly - rather than an asset/reservoir quality issue? The question for me will be okay what action have you or are you taking to make sure that doesn't happend again. Rarely do we get clear answers on this front. 




 

Bullboard Posts