Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Cohen & Steers Tax-Adv Pref Secs and Inc Fund V.PTA


Primary Symbol: PTA

The Funds primary investment objective is high current income. The Funds secondary investment objective is capital appreciation The Fund seeks to achieve its investment objectives by investing at least 80% of its managed assets (i.e., net assets plus assets obtained through leverage) in a portfolio of preferred and other income securities issued by U.S. and non-U.S. companies, which may be either exchange-traded or available over-the-counter. In pursuing its investment objectives, the Fund seeks to achieve favorable after-tax returns for its shareholders by seeking to minimize the U.S. federal income tax consequences on income generated by the Fund. There can be no assurance that the Fund will achieve its investment objectives.


NYSE:PTA - Post by User

Comment by hegemonicoblivionon Oct 07, 2014 12:18pm
92 Views
Post# 23006252

RE:RE:AMER vs PTA: the obvious valuation discrepancy

RE:RE:AMER vs PTA: the obvious valuation discrepancy Think probablity of success is more than your 10 percent stat, thats more like a pure wild cat.
I would thinked the risked numbers for each block or well would be much more appropriate
to produce rather than the unrisked values.  For those talking about AMI... please take a look
at their proven reserves... THE P........ssss..... and remember for those of you comparing
thats the year end 2013 number not the present number for proven and proven and possible.
Would have hoped this price level would have brought out a large buyback, but then again
months ago, I did say we likely would not see a large buyback... and yes we have not.. yet...
and to me doesnt look like we will... In any case, lets hope... that there are some wells 
close to spud date... its been somewhat of a long year so far.. at least for me.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>