Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Cohen & Steers Tax-Adv Pref Secs and Inc Fund V.PTA


Primary Symbol: PTA

The Funds primary investment objective is high current income. The Funds secondary investment objective is capital appreciation The Fund seeks to achieve its investment objectives by investing at least 80% of its managed assets (i.e., net assets plus assets obtained through leverage) in a portfolio of preferred and other income securities issued by U.S. and non-U.S. companies, which may be either exchange-traded or available over-the-counter. In pursuing its investment objectives, the Fund seeks to achieve favorable after-tax returns for its shareholders by seeking to minimize the U.S. federal income tax consequences on income generated by the Fund. There can be no assurance that the Fund will achieve its investment objectives.


NYSE:PTA - Post by User

Post by spammeon Oct 17, 2014 8:22pm
394 Views
Post# 23039735

PTA currently not that cheap

PTA currently not that cheap

Like I keep saying PTA need to increases its 2P reserves.

Paragraph From this article - https://seekingalpha.com/article/2566285-petroamerica-my-additional-take?uprof=45&dr=1

Main find

Oddly enough, after doing my own due diligence, what I came up with on the negative side was also a valuation argument! There is an angle through which Petroamerica is not cheap. This angle is the EV/2P ratio. This ratio is defined as follows (Source: Investopedia ):

The EV/2P ratio is an investment term that refers to the valuation of oil and gas companies. The enterprise value (NYSE:EV) divided by the proven and probable (2P) reserves shows what multiples the company is trading at. The enterprise value reflects the company's total value. Proven and probable (2P) refers to geologic reserves, such as oil, that are more likely than not able to be recovered. This is determined through geological and engineering modeling.

The ratio thus compares the company's value to the value of its proven and probable reserves. Petroamerica's EV is around $160 million, whereas it has 10 million P2 reserves. This gives it an EV/P2 of $16.0. This, in turn, is not incredibly cheap - indeed, it's right around where its average peer trades. For instance, in this recent Regan Pearson article over at Motley Fool, we have the following table:

As we can see, Petroamerica trades right around the same EV/2P ratio as all of these peers.

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>