lol nitpickersThis NR don't change a thing from my point of view. The gold was there years ago and I believe it still is. All this NR is saying because it don't meet NI 43-101 regulations the company can't say what they said in those words. This paragraph says it all
Quote "Since the Beauce Placer historical resources data from Roche, Laval University and the Geological Survey of Canada predated 2001, the AMF determined that the validation process of the historical data used by the corporation did not meet NI 43-101 standards.
Also look at it this way, how many people have heard of people getting cured of some sickness because they took herbs. But you can't say that because you don't have any proof by our standards of the FDA so don't say that. Same thing here.
For me it would be a waste off money to spend it on more drilling and bulk sampling to say what was mined for years...use the money to move this ahead AIMO
Cheers