RE:RE:Re Re Law Suit@bluesteele - The person that should read [259] and the rest of judgement is you. [135] specifically states that the FIS, FCU, and 3.0 assignments are absolute, based on s.(36)1 of the Law and Equity Act, and consequently only 3.0 can sue Dahrouge. Your assertion that FIS, FCU, and 3.0 are all the same entity is wrong.
[135] Where an assignment of a right to sue is absolute, the assignor cannot maintain the action: Stevenson. Having found that both the Energy-Uranium and the Uranium-3.0 assignments are absolute assignments within the meaning of s. 36(1) of the Law and Equity Act, I conclude neither Energy nor Uranium can maintain their Injunction Application or claim for Proprietary Relief. The legal principle is straightforward: the assignor who has agreed to assign away all of its rights cannot subsequently assert them. Accordingly, I grant the relief sought at paragraphs three and four of the defendants’ Summary Trial Application in respect of only Energy and Uranium, and dismiss the plaintiffs’ Injunction Application in respect of Energy and Uranium.