RE:RE:RE:RE:TNG is a buy but the turnaround won't happen overnight
yyz123 wrote: Not too sure what that card might be Dom. None of their business lines seem to have much of a future. The next 2 Q's will show if game tree has any traction. I don't hold much hope for that. Given the low as prices you would need massive player participation. They don't have the games to achieve that.
yakazz...vis a vis traction...when you finally lift your peewee herman sized scooter onto its kickstand and free up your hands...afterall its gonna take all the strength YOU can muster to accomplish this simple feat and after you take your dates home from the local TimHo's you relish in taking first timers to indulge upon...hey your self disclosure on a dating site no less unable to attract inferest in the mainstream obviously...when you get to all of that and thru all of that since you dont have much hope of TNG demonstrating traction...please tell us when you had the epiphany that allows you now to reconcile that Top Line and Revenues are one and the same related to demontrations of traction in the business model when just a short month ago you were presenting them on this very same thread for TNG as divergent and different from eac other when top line and revenues are categorized as one and the same. Would the self disclosed "momma's boy" please finally explain this egregious lack of business acumen...investement savvy and plain out out to lunch status and lack of understanding for anything related to the discussion of investment material....cuz for crying out loud you can't even read a income statement without being able to realize what is important...what is the same and what is immaterial.
We are all still waiting...just don't take that moped bike of yours around the block for a scoot first.
It can wait...as will your dates from the site that ..take the plunge and respond.
SS