Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

LWP Cap Inc LXWKF



GREY:LXWKF - Post by User

Post by electricsocketson Nov 07, 2014 5:17pm
211 Views
Post# 23108666

Oregonian calls it; GMO Measure 92 fails

Oregonian calls it; GMO Measure 92 failsnon-gmo labelling efforts in the State of Oregon FAILS - strong GMO lobby likely killed this effort. 

How will this effect LWP and PCC efforts? 

https://www.kgw.com/story/news/politics/2014/11/04/measure-92-gmo-labels-in-oregon/18491023/

Does it really surprise anyone that big business wants to avoid gmo food labeling as if it's like Ebola? 

Look at this secton from this article: 

"The top five donors on the Yes on 92 side were Dr. Bronner's Magic Soaps, Center for Food Safety, Mercola Health, Tom Hormel and OSPIRG.

For the No on 92 side, the top five donors were Dupont, Monsanto, Pepsi, Coca-Cola and Kraft"



What food companies does PCC want to sell non-gmo oil to? any of those small ones mentioned above that funded the no to gmo labelling effort???

just my thoughts, and only my personal thoughts. 
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>