RE:RE:RE:Question for TuesdayNgamia, Thanks for the post. I don't have a lot of time as a football game I'm going to want with friends is on. But let's take the TLC2000 as an example. They were going to get HC approval in late September or early October. The fact is that HC has not approved the device yet (or maybe I'm the only one on this board that doesn't know that HC did approve it). So everything with TLC2000 is sequential meaning that they can't go to sales until HC approval, etc. So I can't hold sales against them until there is HC approval. Now let's say for the sake of argument that TLC presented approval data of mathematical data or model showing that a 100mm penetration depth as claimed. Let's say that because this claim is deeper than any laser on the market, HC wants actual not theoretical proof. That would be a reasonable reason for delay (remember, I don't know why there is an approval delay). But assuming something like the above is the reason, why can't TLT just come out and give the reason. Instead, there is no update on a critical timeline for TLC2000 and every other TLC2000 is dependant on it. Just give us an update and reasons for delay! You write, "You think pressure from board helps your investment? you think more pressure on Roger makes him work better and talk more"? No, what I think is that in 1st half of 2014 we had a multitude of press releases and interviews on timelines. In the 2nd half of 2015, presumably closer to meeting all timelines, we have TLT silence. That is what I think!