I am not sure that I understand what you are asking  " peplare ".     Below you see what they pay ( right now ) which is a monthly divind of .04 cents.   So this is a yearly dividend of  ( .04 x 12 ) =  .48 cents .    
    Take the .48 and divide it by the share price  ( .48 divided by 2.60 ) = .184615 .      Then multiply this by 100 to get your % yield.  ....    = 18.4615 %  ( as seen below.
 
   Now for example if the share price fell to $ 2.00   then the yield would go up proportionately.   You would still only get the same dividend ( .04 cents per share / month = .48 cents / share / year )   but the yield would then be ......
 
 .48 divided by 2.00 =  .24    ...   x 100 =      24 % yield.     
 
   The yield changes as the share price changes but the dividend remains the same.    The problem is that a company cannot afford to pay this high of a yield for an extended period of time and this is why they had to cut their dividend last year this time.    So unless they can move the stock price way , way higher  ( very unlikely with oil prices where they are )  then they will have to cut their dividend and more than just in half like they did last year this time.
 
   Hope this helps.
 

Quote Details

 
Open 2.60   P/E Ratio (TTM) --
Last Bid/Size 2.60 / 267   EPS (TTM) -6.55
Last Ask/Size 2.61 / 132   Next Earnings 9 Mar 2015
Previous Close 2.59   Beta 2.47
Volume 1,632,453   Monthly Dividend 0.0400
Average Volume 1,863,512   Dividend Yield 18.46%
Day High 2.82   Ex-Dividend Date 26 Nov 2014
Day Low 2.55   Shares Outstanding 200.6M
52 Week High 9.09   # of Floating Shares 191.8783M
52 Week Low 2.28   Short Interest as % of Float --
DRIP Eligible Yes


 
 peplare - (11/28/2014 11:39:46 AM)
RE:RE:Banks likely to force cutbacks in capital spending year-emd
Highrider do you think they pay more out in dividends when the yield is higher