Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Cohen & Steers Tax-Adv Pref Secs and Inc Fund V.PTA


Primary Symbol: PTA

The Funds primary investment objective is high current income. The Funds secondary investment objective is capital appreciation The Fund seeks to achieve its investment objectives by investing at least 80% of its managed assets (i.e., net assets plus assets obtained through leverage) in a portfolio of preferred and other income securities issued by U.S. and non-U.S. companies, which may be either exchange-traded or available over-the-counter. In pursuing its investment objectives, the Fund seeks to achieve favorable after-tax returns for its shareholders by seeking to minimize the U.S. federal income tax consequences on income generated by the Fund. There can be no assurance that the Fund will achieve its investment objectives.


NYSE:PTA - Post by User

Comment by mrpanickon Dec 09, 2014 5:39pm
159 Views
Post# 23212466

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Oil price mid-long term direction as sealed by recent data

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Oil price mid-long term direction as sealed by recent data To Hedgie's point about G&A costs, they were $9.30 / boepd (see Q3 management discussion) for the first 9 months of 2014. However, that was more than 2X the cost $ / boepd for the same period of 2013. Which number is more typical of what we can expect going forward? I think we will see closer to $5 / boepd. Aside from the Suroco transaction they had lower Q3 production due to the PUT shut-in which raised unit costs. The Suroco costs were spread out over a couple of quarters and are difficult to fully exclude. They also did a number of farm-in and farm-out deals and were undoubtedly evaluating many other potential deals. The 2013 numbers show a decent baseline of what the company needs to spend on G&A. They were under $5 then and I think we'll be close to that again in 2015.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>