Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Mart Resources Inc MAUXF



OTCPK:MAUXF - Post by User

Comment by Clairedon Dec 16, 2014 9:56am
201 Views
Post# 23235006

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Supply and Demand

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Supply and Demandhttps://www.forbes.com/sites/energysource/2012/04/25/the-surprising-reason-that-oil-subsidies-persist-even-liberals-love-them/

the point was that the U.S. is not importing much oil and that they want to be energy independent. Doesn't matter if it's a tax break or direct cash, many refer to it as a subsidy because it has the same effect by stimulating production.  I've also read about the oil industries government help in the form of indirect or direct cash (more commonly known as a subsidy)  and seen it on a bevy of documentary films. Your missing the point and getting lost in technicalities. Go harass Forbes for their definition of subsidy I'm done explaining myself.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>